| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/02/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/03/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
PERES, G. R. P.; LIMA, M. A. de; BATISTA, G. das G.; ANDRADE, C. A. de; HERLING, V. R.; PIOTTO, V. C.; NAREZZI, F.; FILIZOLA, H. F.; SILVA, J. A. da; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
GIULIANA REGIA PINEDA PERES, CNPq; MAGDA APARECIDA DE LIMA, CNPMA; GIOVANA DAS GRACAS BAPTISTA, CNPq; CRISTIANO ALBERTO DE ANDRADE, CNPMA; VALDO HERLING, FZEA-USP; VANESSA PIOTTO, FZEA-USP; FABRICIO NAREZZI, CNPq; HELOISA FERREIRA FILIZOLA, CNPMA; JOSE ANTONIO DA SILVA, CNPq; ROSA TOYOKO SHIRAISHI FRIGHETTO, CNPMA. |
|
Título: |
Nitrous oxide emission in pasture under rotational and continuous managements. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GREENHOUSE GASES IN AGRICULTURE, 2., 2016, Campo Grande, MS. Proceedings... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016. p. 42-47. (Embrapa Gado de Corte. Documentos, 216). |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: One of the most important anthropogenic methane and nitrous oxide sources in Brazil are the agricultural activities. In 2010 it was estimated that the emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) were 13,133 and 521 Gg, respectively (BRAZIL, 2013). Pasturelands contribute with N2O emissions, which vary with the adopted management and other variables. The types of management used in pastures may be distinct, with the extensive cultivation, in which there is no reseed or fertilization, and the intensive cultivation, with periodic fertilization and reseeding (HANSEN et al., 2014). The grazing method is an important mechanism in the production system, being potentially effective in providing answers to improve the productivity and sustainability of cattle production systems in pastures. Southeastern Brazil is a region with expressive production beef cattle. Grazing methods used in the country are commonly classified as continuous or rotational pasture. In the first one, animals have uninterrupted access to the pasture area, during all the period grazing is allowed (ALLEN et al., 2011). Rotative pasture utilize grazing and rest periods between the paddocks. In this experiment, Nelore cattle grazed rotative pasture during 7 days, after which period the area rested 28 days, totalizing a cycle of 35 days at the paddock. Mensuration of nitrogenous gas losses in tropical savanna are still scarce in literature, especially about nitrous oxide emission factors in soils with the addition of nitrogen fertilizer (SMITH, BOUWMAN, BRAATZ, 1999). This study aimed to quantify nitrous oxide emissions in pastures under two grazing methods, not fertilized and fertilized rotational, in Southeastern Brazil. MenosAbstract: One of the most important anthropogenic methane and nitrous oxide sources in Brazil are the agricultural activities. In 2010 it was estimated that the emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) were 13,133 and 521 Gg, respectively (BRAZIL, 2013). Pasturelands contribute with N2O emissions, which vary with the adopted management and other variables. The types of management used in pastures may be distinct, with the extensive cultivation, in which there is no reseed or fertilization, and the intensive cultivation, with periodic fertilization and reseeding (HANSEN et al., 2014). The grazing method is an important mechanism in the production system, being potentially effective in providing answers to improve the productivity and sustainability of cattle production systems in pastures. Southeastern Brazil is a region with expressive production beef cattle. Grazing methods used in the country are commonly classified as continuous or rotational pasture. In the first one, animals have uninterrupted access to the pasture area, during all the period grazing is allowed (ALLEN et al., 2011). Rotative pasture utilize grazing and rest periods between the paddocks. In this experiment, Nelore cattle grazed rotative pasture during 7 days, after which period the area rested 28 days, totalizing a cycle of 35 days at the paddock. Mensuration of nitrogenous gas losses in tropical savanna are still scarce in literature, especially about nitrous oxide emission factors in soils wi... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Emissão de gases; oxido nitroso. |
|
Thesagro: |
fertilizante nitrogenado; Pastagem; Solo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Greenhouse gas emissions; Nitrous oxide. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/156064/1/2016AA47.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02738nam a2200301 a 4500
001 2064687
005 2017-03-06
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPERES, G. R. P.
245 $aNitrous oxide emission in pasture under rotational and continuous managements.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GREENHOUSE GASES IN AGRICULTURE, 2., 2016, Campo Grande, MS. Proceedings... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016. p. 42-47. (Embrapa Gado de Corte. Documentos, 216).$c2016
520 $aAbstract: One of the most important anthropogenic methane and nitrous oxide sources in Brazil are the agricultural activities. In 2010 it was estimated that the emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) were 13,133 and 521 Gg, respectively (BRAZIL, 2013). Pasturelands contribute with N2O emissions, which vary with the adopted management and other variables. The types of management used in pastures may be distinct, with the extensive cultivation, in which there is no reseed or fertilization, and the intensive cultivation, with periodic fertilization and reseeding (HANSEN et al., 2014). The grazing method is an important mechanism in the production system, being potentially effective in providing answers to improve the productivity and sustainability of cattle production systems in pastures. Southeastern Brazil is a region with expressive production beef cattle. Grazing methods used in the country are commonly classified as continuous or rotational pasture. In the first one, animals have uninterrupted access to the pasture area, during all the period grazing is allowed (ALLEN et al., 2011). Rotative pasture utilize grazing and rest periods between the paddocks. In this experiment, Nelore cattle grazed rotative pasture during 7 days, after which period the area rested 28 days, totalizing a cycle of 35 days at the paddock. Mensuration of nitrogenous gas losses in tropical savanna are still scarce in literature, especially about nitrous oxide emission factors in soils with the addition of nitrogen fertilizer (SMITH, BOUWMAN, BRAATZ, 1999). This study aimed to quantify nitrous oxide emissions in pastures under two grazing methods, not fertilized and fertilized rotational, in Southeastern Brazil.
650 $aGreenhouse gas emissions
650 $aNitrous oxide
650 $afertilizante nitrogenado
650 $aPastagem
650 $aSolo
653 $aEmissão de gases
653 $aoxido nitroso
700 1 $aLIMA, M. A. de
700 1 $aBATISTA, G. das G.
700 1 $aANDRADE, C. A. de
700 1 $aHERLING, V. R.
700 1 $aPIOTTO, V. C.
700 1 $aNAREZZI, F.
700 1 $aFILIZOLA, H. F.
700 1 $aSILVA, J. A. da
700 1 $aFRIGHETTO, R. T. S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/10/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/10/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
NUNES, C. A.; BERENGUER, E.; FRANÇA, F.; FERREIRA, J. N.; LEES, A. C.; LOUZADA, J.; SAYER, E. J.; SOLAR, R.; SMITH, C. C.; ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.; BRAGA, D. de L.; CAMARGO, P. B. de; CERRI, C. E. P.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de; DURIGAN, M.; MOURA, N.; OLIVEIRA, V. H. F.; RIBAS, C.; VAZ-DE-MELLO, F.; VIEIRA, I.; ZANETTI, R.; BARLOW, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
CÁSSIO ALENCAR NUNES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; ERIKA BERENGUER, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; FILIPE FRANÇA, UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; ALEXANDER C. LEES, MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY; JULIO LOUZADA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; EMMA J. SAYER, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; RICARDO SOLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; CHARLOTTE C. SMITH, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; LUIZ E. O. C. ARAGÃO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; DANIELLE DE LIMA BRAGA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; PLINIO BARBOSA DE CAMARGO, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; CARLOS EDUARDO PELLEGRINO CERRI, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RAIMUNDO COSME DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPATU; MARIANA DURIGAN, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; NÁRGILA MOURA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; VICTOR HUGO FONSECA OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; CARLA RIBAS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; FERNANDO VAZ-DE-MELLO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MATO GROSSO; IMA VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; RONALD ZANETTI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; JOS BARLOW, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS. |
|
Título: |
Linking land-use and land-cover transitions to their ecological impact in the Amazon. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
PNAS, v. 119, n. 27, e2202310119, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.220231011 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Human activities pose a major threat to tropical forest biodiversity and ecosystem serv-ices. Although the impacts of deforestation are well studied, multiple land-use andland-cover transitions (LULCTs) occur in tropical landscapes, and we do not knowhow LULCTs differ in their rates or impacts on key ecosystem components. Here, wequantified the impacts of 18 LULCTs on three ecosystem components (biodiversity,carbon, and soil), based on 18 variables collected from 310 sites in the BrazilianAmazon. Across all LULCTs, biodiversity was the most affected ecosystem component,followed by carbon stocks, but the magnitude of change differed widely amongLULCTs and individual variables. Forest clearance for pasture was the most prevalentand high-impact transition, but we also identified other LULCTs with high impact butlower prevalence (e.g., forest to agriculture). Our study demonstrates the importanceof considering multiple ecosystem components and LULCTs to understand the conse-quences of human activities in tropical landscapes |
|
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Carbono; Degradação Ambiental; Desmatamento; Exploração Florestal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biodiversity; Carbon; Deforestation; Degradation; Logging. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1147169/1/pnas.2202310119.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02398naa a2200505 a 4500
001 2147169
005 2022-10-06
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.220231011$2DOI
100 1 $aNUNES, C. A.
245 $aLinking land-use and land-cover transitions to their ecological impact in the Amazon.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aHuman activities pose a major threat to tropical forest biodiversity and ecosystem serv-ices. Although the impacts of deforestation are well studied, multiple land-use andland-cover transitions (LULCTs) occur in tropical landscapes, and we do not knowhow LULCTs differ in their rates or impacts on key ecosystem components. Here, wequantified the impacts of 18 LULCTs on three ecosystem components (biodiversity,carbon, and soil), based on 18 variables collected from 310 sites in the BrazilianAmazon. Across all LULCTs, biodiversity was the most affected ecosystem component,followed by carbon stocks, but the magnitude of change differed widely amongLULCTs and individual variables. Forest clearance for pasture was the most prevalentand high-impact transition, but we also identified other LULCTs with high impact butlower prevalence (e.g., forest to agriculture). Our study demonstrates the importanceof considering multiple ecosystem components and LULCTs to understand the conse-quences of human activities in tropical landscapes
650 $aBiodiversity
650 $aCarbon
650 $aDeforestation
650 $aDegradation
650 $aLogging
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aCarbono
650 $aDegradação Ambiental
650 $aDesmatamento
650 $aExploração Florestal
700 1 $aBERENGUER, E.
700 1 $aFRANÇA, F.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, J. N.
700 1 $aLEES, A. C.
700 1 $aLOUZADA, J.
700 1 $aSAYER, E. J.
700 1 $aSOLAR, R.
700 1 $aSMITH, C. C.
700 1 $aARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.
700 1 $aBRAGA, D. de L.
700 1 $aCAMARGO, P. B. de
700 1 $aCERRI, C. E. P.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de
700 1 $aDURIGAN, M.
700 1 $aMOURA, N.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, V. H. F.
700 1 $aRIBAS, C.
700 1 $aVAZ-DE-MELLO, F.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, I.
700 1 $aZANETTI, R.
700 1 $aBARLOW, J.
773 $tPNAS$gv. 119, n. 27, e2202310119, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
